Saturday, February 7, 2009

We're All Neocons to This Day

Remember back in the good ole halcyon days when the whole world, including Iraq, was our oyster and America, to paraphrase Chuck Krauthammer, bestrode the world like a colossus arrogantly dangling its unilateral genitalia over that oyster of a world?

Judith Miller notwithstanding, the American mainstream media, while it didn't exactly lie us into Iraq, nonetheless acted like a gigantic cheerleading squad repeating everything ever uttered by Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rice, Rumsfeld, Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan as if they were the fifth gospel of Jesus fucking Christ. "Gimme a Dubya!" "W!" "Gimme an A!" "A!" "Gimme an R!" "R!" "What's that spell?" "P-E-A-C-E!"

Note that all these pronouncements of early victory came before George W. Bush's famous goony bird landing on the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003 to announce the end of major military operations in Iraq. Note, also, that not all of these blowhards are of the odious ilk of Krauthammer, Judith Miller or Bill O'Reilly and the other fortune cookie prognosticators at Fox "News" but the "liberal" NY Times, the LA Times, NPR and Fox's token liberal, Alan Colmes.
"Iraq Is All but Won; Now What?" (Los Angeles Times headline, 4/10/03)

"Now that the combat phase of the war in Iraq is officially over, what begins is a debate throughout the entire U.S. government over America's unrivaled power and how best to use it." (CBS reporter Joie Chen, 5/4/03)

"Congress returns to Washington this week to a world very different from the one members left two weeks ago. The war in Iraq is essentially over and domestic issues are regaining attention." (NPR's Bob Edwards, 4/28/03)

"This has been a tough war for commentators on the American left. To hope for defeat meant cheering for Saddam Hussein. To hope for victory meant cheering for President Bush. The toppling of Mr. Hussein, or at least a statue of him, has made their arguments even harder to defend. Liberal writers for ideologically driven magazines like The Nation and for less overtly political ones like The New Yorker did not predict a defeat, but the terrible consequences many warned of have not happened. Now liberal commentators must address the victory at hand and confront an ascendant conservative juggernaut that asserts United States might can set the world right." (New York Times reporter David Carr, 4/16/03)

"Some journalists, in my judgment, just can't stand success, especially a few liberal columnists and newspapers and a few Arab reporters." (CNN's Lou Dobbs, 4/14/03)

"I doubt that the journalists at the New York Times and NPR or at ABC or at CNN are going to ever admit just how wrong their negative pronouncements were over the past four weeks." (MSNBC's Joe Scarborough, 4/9/03)

"Tommy Franks and the coalition forces have demonstrated the old axiom that boldness on the battlefield produces swift and relatively bloodless victory. The three-week swing through Iraq has utterly shattered skeptics' complaints." (Fox News Channel's Tony Snow, 4/13/03)

"The only people who think this wasn't a victory are Upper Westside liberals, and a few people here in Washington." (Charles Krauthammer, Inside Washington, WUSA-TV, 4/19/03)

"The war was the hard part. The hard part was putting together a coalition, getting 300,000 troops over there and all their equipment and winning. And it gets easier. I mean, setting up a democracy is hard, but it is not as hard as winning a war." (Fox News Channel's Fred Barnes, 4/10/03)

"Why don't the damn Democrats give the president his day? He won today. He did well today." (MSNBC's Chris Matthews, 4/9/03)

"What's he going to talk about a year from now, the fact that the war went too well and it's over? I mean, don't these things sort of lose their--Isn't there a fresh date on some of these debate points?" (MSNBC's Chris Matthews, speaking about Howard Dean--4/9/03)

"Now that the war in Iraq is all but over, should the people in Hollywood who opposed the president admit they were wrong?" (Fox News Channel's Alan Colmes, 4/25/03)

"I'm waiting to hear the words 'I was wrong' from some of the world's most elite journalists, politicians and Hollywood types.... I just wonder, who's going to be the first elitist to show the character to say: 'Hey, America, guess what? I was wrong'? Maybe the White House will get an apology, first, from the New York Times' Maureen Dowd. Now, Ms. Dowd mocked the morality of this war....

"Do you all remember Scott Ritter, you know, the former chief U.N. weapons inspector who played chief stooge for Saddam Hussein? Well, Mr. Ritter actually told a French radio network that -- quote, 'The United States is going to leave Baghdad with its tail between its legs, defeated.' Sorry, Scott. I think you've been chasing the wrong tail, again.

"Maybe disgraced commentators and politicians alike, like Daschle, Jimmy Carter, Dennis Kucinich, and all those others, will step forward tonight and show the content of their character by simply admitting what we know already: that their wartime predictions were arrogant, they were misguided and they were dead wrong. Maybe, just maybe, these self-anointed critics will learn from their mistakes. But I doubt it. After all, we don't call them 'elitists' for nothing." (MSNBC's Joe Scarborough, 4/10/03)

"Over the next couple of weeks when we find the chemical weapons this guy was amassing, the fact that this war was attacked by the left and so the right was so vindicated, I think, really means that the left is going to have to hang its head for three or four more years." (Fox News Channel's Dick Morris, 4/9/03)

"Well, the hot story of the week is victory.... The Tommy Franks-Don Rumsfeld battle plan, war plan, worked brilliantly, a three-week war with mercifully few American deaths or Iraqi civilian deaths.... There is a lot of work yet to do, but all the naysayers have been humiliated so far.... The final word on this is, hooray." (Fox News Channel's Morton Kondracke, 4/12/03)

"This will be no war -- there will be a fairly brief and ruthless military intervention.... The president will give an order. [The attack] will be rapid, accurate and dazzling.... It will be greeted by the majority of the Iraqi people as an emancipation. And I say, bring it on." (Christopher Hitchens, in a 1/28/03 debate-- cited in the Observer, 3/30/03)

"I will bet you the best dinner in the gaslight district of San Diego that military action will not last more than a week. Are you willing to take that wager?" (Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly, 1/29/03)

"It won't take weeks. You know that, professor. Our military machine will crush Iraq in a matter of days and there's no question that it will." (Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly, 2/10/03)

"There's no way. There's absolutely no way. They may bomb for a matter of weeks, try to soften them up as they did in Afghanistan. But once the United States and Britain unleash, it's maybe hours. They're going to fold like that." (Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly, 2/10/03)

"He [Saddam Hussein] actually thought that he could stop us and win the debate worldwide. But he didn't--he didn't bargain on a two- or three week war. I actually thought it would be less than two weeks." (NBC reporter Fred Francis, Chris Matthews Show, 4/13/03)

"Speaking to the U.N. Security Council last week, Secretary of State Colin Powell made so strong a case that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein is in material breach of U.N. resolutions that only the duped, the dumb and the desperate could ignore it." (Cal Thomas, syndicated column, 2/12/03)

"Saddam could decide to take Baghdad with him. One Arab intelligence officer interviewed by Newsweek spoke of 'the green mushroom' over Baghdad--the modern-day caliph bidding a grotesque bio-chem farewell to the land of the living alongside thousands of his subjects as well as his enemies. Saddam wants to be remembered. He has the means and the demonic imagination. It is up to U.S. armed forces to stop him before he can achieve notoriety for all time." (Newsweek, 3/17/03)

"Chris, more than anything else, real vindication for the administration. One, credible evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Two, you know what? There were a lot of terrorists here, really bad guys. I saw them." (MSNBC reporter Bob Arnot, 4/9/03)

"Even in the flush of triumph, doubts will be raised. Where are the supplies of germs and poison gas and plans for nukes to justify pre-emption? (Freed scientists will lead us to caches no inspectors could find.) What about remaining danger from Baathist torturers and war criminals forming pockets of resistance and plotting vengeance? (Their death wish is our command.)" (New York Times' William Safire, 4/10/03)

"We're all neo-cons now." (MSNBC's Chris Matthews, 4/9/03)

So what has the MSM learned from the lessons of the last six years? Not much, apparently:
A new Iraq is emerging from five years of American invasion and occupation, and at first glance it looks distressingly like the old Iraq: Its people are still bound by the barbed wire of suspicion and hatred as much as by any sense of common purpose and history.

But the new Iraq is clearly a nation in ways that the old Iraq -- long considered by experts as an artificial creation that would fly apart under the pressure of outside intervention -- was not. It did not fly apart and has in fact undergone significant, positive mutations as a result of a soon-to-subside U.S. presence. - Jim Hoagland, the Washington Post, February 8, 2009

Now, if an unwarranted invasion of a much smaller country that detours a wounded and anxious superpower away from its nascent war on terror, knocks out its infrastructure by killing local industry and farming, forcing democratic elections less than two years later amid sectarian violence and poverty doesn't somehow bespeak of "an artificial creation that would fly apart under the pressure of outside intervention", then I don't know what does.

To say that Iraq is "a good example" for other nations dying to be invaded under false pretenses to emulate is to say that America was a safe, stable, enviable example of democracy as Washington, DC burned under the onslaught of the British of the War of 1812, an invasion that saw the burning of the White House (forcing President James Madison to flee the Capitol) and the burning of the Library of Congress. Relatively speaking, that, too, was better than living under the yoke of a despotic tyrant 35 years before.

Always lost on everyone from top to bottom, including the "liberal" media, is that the war was based on a greasy pack of lies that had been knocked down like so many flaming, one-legged straw men, lies that were no longer supported by the administration that had launched those lies. Lies that, once the contractors were sleek and bloated and the damage done, the profits reaped and Iraq raped of all but its oil, were so bereft of political currency that people like Cheney went on TV and said, even if they knew Iraq had no WMD's, we still would've invaded.

Oh, but whole neighborhoods aren't being slaughtered, anymore, through ethnic cleansing. We're bribing Sunni warlords into not killing us, anymore, so the surge is working, working, comrades! All you dissident liberals line up here for "re-education."

It's like a burglar boasting that he straightened the pictures along your stairway wall after looting your silverware drawer and wall safe, killing the head of the family, raping the matriarch, selling the children into slavery then torching the place on the way out.

Even this article by Steven Lee Meyers of the NY Times soft-pedals the inherent problems in Iraq based largely on the "peaceful" elections late last month that were peaceful only when 140,000 US troops put their lives on the line to ensure that peace. Then as now, we were treated to a cornucopia of purple fingers and smiling Iraqis, except this time around the purple fingers were played down.

Hardly a word about torture, contractor corruption or any other counterpoint of substance in the immediate wake of the most miserably failed and murderously incompetent, furtive, coldblooded and dishonest jackals in the galactic history of carbon-based life forms. To fall into line with this thinking again, and assuming that momentary, transient caution equals informed, fair and balanced journalism, is to begin to burnish a legacy for Bush that he himself couldn't begin to burnish.

If journalism is history's first draft, then we are not rewriting that first draft as much as we're fashioning a final draft of it. We're whiteboarding history that ought not be forgotten, we're piling cities of dishonesty atop the crumbling ruins of what little of the truth that was told.

Iraq was invaded on false pretenses that were revealed years ago. The WMD's, the 9/11-Saddam connection, the al Qaeda-Iraq connection. It was all a lie. How is this even worthy of debate? Even if the lies were insupportable 6 years ago, they would've invaded, anyway. But we did support them. Our media supported them. And they're supporting them still.


At February 7, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Blogger Bukko Boomeranger said...

The first time I read "1984," I used to wonder how it would be possible to erase the memory of all that had happened before. I thought it was a bogus precept of Orwell's; that society would not easily ignore reality. But with examples like Hoagland's, I see I took too charitable a view of society.

At February 8, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Blogger Cossack said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

At February 8, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Blogger Cossack said...

Yea verily and well said. Seems long term memory, especially for unpleasant events, has been totally excised in the population. There are a few of us (who obviously need re-education) who retain a mental record of events as they truly transpired.

Part of it is also that all those you quoted have not been served a grand feast of humble pie. Just like Billy Kristol, no matter how egregiously wrong they have been, there have been no consequences...except to fail up! Those that have suffered negative consequences were those that actually called things right.

At February 8, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I flew into Viet Nam as advanced party of the US Army offensive troops in May of 1965 under the lie to "Protect the US air Bases".

It didn't take long to realze the truth. We we just looking for a fight and we got it.

Be it Viet Nam or Iraq, it is always a lot easier into the places ..than getting out them.

At February 8, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Blogger kelley b. said...

The Ministry of Information has obviously gotten the desired bang for its $4.7 billion.

Now all that's needed is to have a draft that isn't, so to speak, and they'll be set to expand their jobs program as widely as they want.

At February 8, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bukko, I've been saying since Bush was installed as acting-President in 2001 that Winston Smith is out of a job.

MiniTru no longer has to bother re-writing the past. Journalists today refuse to look up the historical record and mindlessly recite whatever propaganda the Administration orders them to say.

If the Department of Christian Faith says the moon is made of cheese and is only 6000 years old, then so be it. That must be true, since the Conservatives said so.

So it doesn't matter if the record of the last 100 years proves that tax cuts cause severe economic damage. The Conservatives say the opposite and that's good enough for the MSM.

I hear Winston can't even get a pumping gas in New Jersey!

At February 9, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm convinced the war in Iraq---and Afghanistan too.....Was necessary to the GOP Machine and its connected constituency. How much of those billions looted from the US Treasury do ya think will make their way back into the GOP Machine?

At February 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What everyone's forgetting is:


It only takes ONE senator to filibuster. The Democrats could have stopped ALL OF IT, but they didn't.

Why should they bother; you liberals have proven to them that you'll still unconditionally support them even though:

1. They oppose a single-payer health care system.

2. They voted for the war.

3. They enabled the fascist in the White House to stay in power.

4. They helped the Republicans overturn the Constitution.

5. They saddled working people with NAFTA and the WTO.

6. They maintained laws (like Taft-Hartley) that prevent the formation of unions.

7. They allowed media consolidation, which told us Iraq was planning a nuclear attack on the US.

8. They maintain laws that inhibit non-corporate-funded parties.

9. They voted for fascist judges on the Supreme Court.

10. They allowed the government to spy on us, and set a precedent that telecom companies that illegally did this weren't charged with anything.

11. They allowed our government to torture.

12. They supported tax cuts for the rich.

These are all right-wing positions.

Folks, we're never going to see any significant change until at least SOME of you stop voting for the two corporate-funded parties.

The Green Party doesn't accept ANY corporate money. If they get 5% of the vote, they're eligible for Federal funding. They deserve your votes.

At February 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Blogger jurassicpork said...


Obviously, you're not a frequent visitor to Pottersville. If you were, you'd know that I take potshots at the Dems almost as often as I do the Repubs.

How does this post in any, way, shape or form excuse or "unconditionally support" the Democratic Party after this latest cavein to a GOP minority?

I do not support the Democratic Party when I feel they do not support it. I have criticized Pelosi, I have criticized Reid and I have already criticized even St. Obama when everyone was weeping with relief.

Do not paint me with your broad, green brush unless you're on solid ground, my friend. Go take a look at the progressive blogs and tell me how many of us unconditionally support "Give 'Em Head" Harry Reid.

At February 9, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seriously, Alan8, I hear what you're sayin', but you're barking up the wrong tree. You probably would've told us in 2004 to vote Nader as a protest.

Well, having vote Nader in protest in 96 and 2000 (as I knew my states electoral votes went to Gore anyways, asshole that he was), I can tell you that there are in fact many many differences between Demos and Repugs, and 2004 was not the time to vote in protest. The Brown Shirts were everywhere, and likely cheated their way into another 4 years.

The Repuglican Neocon Cocksuckers (in-the-closet-only, of course) were and continue to be a threat to everything that America stands for, as well as all of Humanity. There is no reasoning with these monsters. Sometimes, one must deal with reality, and that reality of life is that sometimes you have no choice but to choose the lesser of two evils (cliche, cha-ching!). Otherwise, go with the "Write-in-Mickey-Mouse-Vote", which is just as pointless.

The Demos are another s†øry, to be dealt with at a less perilous time...

At February 9, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And BTW, wonderful post jp! Been enjoying your ramblings for years...

At February 10, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well,since someone mentioned Nader. Nader did some good things....Back in the day...But,I've always felt if Nader had a genuine interest in correcting the wrongs within government,the man would've run for a seat in congress before running for the highest seat in the land. Somewhere along the line,Nader saw himself as a rockstar, and allowed his hubris to take over. Fuck him.


Post a Comment

<< Home

KindleindaWind, my writing blog.

All Time Classics

  • Our Worse Half: The 25 Most Embarrassing States.
  • The Missing Security Tapes From the World Trade Center.
  • It's a Blunderful Life.
  • The Civil War II
  • Sweet Jesus, I Hate America
  • Top Ten Conservative Books
  • I Am Mr. Ed
  • Glenn Beck: Racist, Hate Monger, Comedian
  • The Ten Worst Music Videos of all Time
  • Assclowns of the Week

  • Links to the first 33 Assclowns of the Week.
  • Links to Assclowns of the Week 38-63.
  • #106: The Turkey Has Landed edition
  • #105: Blame it on Paris or Putin edition
  • #104: Make Racism Great Again Also Labor Day edition
  • #103: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Toilet edition
  • #102: Orange is the New Fat edition
  • #101: Electoral College Dropouts edition
  • #100: Centennial of Silliness edition
  • #99: Dr. Strangehate edition
  • #98: Get Bentghazi edition
  • #97: SNAPping Your Fingers at the Poor edition
  • #96: Treat or Treat, Kiss My Ass edition
  • #95: Monumental Stupidity double-sized edition
  • #94: House of 'Tards edition
  • #93: You Da Bomb! edition.
  • #92: Akin to a Fool edition.
  • #91: Aurora Moronealis edition.
  • #90: Keep Your Gubmint Hands Off My High Pre'mums and Deductibles! edition.
  • #89: Occupy the Catbird Seat/Thanksgiving edition.
  • #88: Heil Hitler edition.
  • #87: Let Sleeping Elephants Lie edition.
  • #86: the Maniacs edition.
  • #85: The Top 50 Assclowns of 2010 edition.
  • #(19)84: Midterm Madness edition.
  • #83: Spill, Baby, Spill! edition.
  • #82: Leave Corporations Alone, They’re People! edition.
  • #81: Hatin' on Haiti edition.
  • #80: Don't Get Your Panties in a Twist edition.
  • #79: Top 50 Assclowns of 2009 edition.
  • #78: Nattering Nabobs of Negativism edition.
  • #77: ...And Justice For Once edition.
  • #76: Reading Tea Leaves/Labor Day edition.
  • #75: Diamond Jubilee/Inaugural Edition
  • #74: Dropping the Crystal Ball Edition
  • #73: The Twelve Assclowns of Christmas Edition
  • #72: Trick or Treat Election Day Edition
  • #71: Grand Theft Autocrats Edition
  • #70: Soulless Corporations and the Politicians Who Love Them Edition
  • Empire Of The Senseless.
  • Conservative Values for an Unsaved World.
  • Esquire's Charles Pierce.
  • Brilliant @ Breakfast.
  • The Burning Platform.
  • The Rant.
  • Mock, Paper, Scissors.
  • James Petras.
  • Towle Road.
  • Avedon's Sideshow (the new site).
  • At Largely, Larisa Alexandrovna's place.
  • The Daily Howler.
  • The DCist.
  • Greg Palast.
  • Jon Swift. RIP, Al.
  • God is For Suckers.
  • The Rude Pundit.
  • Driftglass.
  • Newshounds.
  • William Grigg, a great find.
  • Brad Blog.
  • Down With Tyranny!, Howie Klein's blog.
  • Wayne's World. Party time! Excellent!
  • Busted Knuckles, aka Ornery Bastard.
  • Mills River Progressive.
  • Right Wing Watch.
  • Earthbond Misfit.
  • Anosognosia.
  • Echidne of the Snakes.
  • They Gave Us a Republic.
  • The Gawker.
  • Outtake Online, Emmy-winner Charlotte Robinson's site.
  • Skippy, the Bush Kangaroo
  • No More Mr. Nice Blog.
  • Head On Radio Network, Bob Kincaid.
  • Spocko's Brain.
  • Pandagon.
  • Slackivist.
  • WTF Is It Now?
  • No Blood For Hubris.
  • Lydia Cornell, a very smart and accomplished lady.
  • Roger Ailes (the good one.)
  • BlondeSense.
  • The Smirking Chimp.
  • Hammer of the Blogs.
  • Vast Left Wing Conspiracy.
  • Argville.
  • Existentialist Cowboy.
  • The Progressive.
  • The Nation.
  • Mother Jones.
  • Vanity Fair.
  • Citizens For Legitimate Government.
  • News Finder.
  • Indy Media Center.
  • Lexis News.
  • Military Religious Freedom.
  • McClatchy Newspapers.
  • The New Yorker.
  • Bloggingheads TV, political vlogging.
  • Find, the next-best thing to Nexis.
  • Altweeklies, for the news you won't get just anywhere.
  • The Smirking Chimp
  • Don Emmerich's Peace Blog
  • Wikileaks.
  • The Peoples' Voice.
  • CIA World Fact Book.
  • IP address locator.
  • Tom Tomorrow's hilarious strip.
  • Babelfish, an instant, online translator. I love to translate Ann Coulter's site into German.
  • Newsmeat: Find out who's donating to whom.
  • Wikipedia.
  • Uncyclopedia.
  • Icasualties
  • Free Press
  • YouTube
  • The Bone Bridge.
  • Powered by Blogger