Stop ‘n’ Starve
I shop at this store, even though it
never runs out of ways to disappoint me (The only reason I shop there at all is
because of the gas reward points it offers. You get a whopping .10¢ off a gallon for every $100 you spend there, which is still a damned
sight better than Hannaford’s, a competing supermarket in town. But, unlike Stop'n'Starve, they don't artificially bloat their prices to coerce you into signing up for a card that they then use to creepily track your spending habits and spit out of the register targeted coupons for the items you'd just purchased.) and have more
or less shopped here since it first opened around 1990. Both my stepsons worked
at the local Stop’n’Shop when they were young (the older one got terminated
when his trick knee gave out on him and he informed management he’d have to
have corrective surgery on it, a standard practice Stop’n’Shop has used for
many, many years on teenaged employees once they’re up for the piddling raises
they offer but more on that later.).
About 12 or more
years ago, possibly before Bush got in the White House, Stop’n’Shop’s starting
wages, which were always about a buck or two an hour higher than the prevailing
minimum wage, began stagnating. Jobs that used to pay $7-8 an hour, within a
year, were going at a full buck an hour less. And this was long, long before
the serious economic downturn that began under Bush and has miserably continued
unabated under Obama. Pretty soon, it was obvious that these jobs the
corporation would post on its store windows were going for the prevailing
minimum wage and it’s a practice the store has continued for over a decade
since.
I don’t know when the United Food and Commercial Workers Union got in there or if they’ve always been there but I’ve long wondered if these minimum wage-earning
workers ever had to pay union dues. Today, I’ve received confirmation from one
(who also makes minimum wage working for an even huger corporation, the Royal
Dutch Shell oil company) that they do. Obviously, this is a closed union shop,
meaning if you don’t join, you get fired on the spot (or perhaps, I even more suspect, their union dues are automatically siphoned out by the company like child support garnishments.). Otherwise, if you’re
making minimum wage with crappy to nonexistent health care bennies, what’s your
incentive for joining and paying union dues out of your minimum wage paycheck?
Glassdoor.com
has a list of 149 job titles and a range of wages for each specific title at
Stop’n’Shop. Among the titles listed on page
two, and I wish I was making this up, is one that's the lowest on an already
rock-bottom scale, and it's actually called a “minion”. I’m sure we all know the definition of
the word “minion” but in case you want a more detailed definition, here are several. If you
look at all 149 jobs, you’ll note that approximately half or more of the jobs
are within a dollar an hour within the state-mandated minimum wage of $8 per
hour (I wonder if they have job titles such as "peon", "shit-shoveler", "flunky", "serf" and "sharecropper.").
As recently as
last February, the corporation began shadow-boxing with its bedroom union and
there was a threat
of a massive strike that made the Stop’n’Shop corporation set up hiring centers to hire scabs that offered more money than their long-term, parttime employees. This
means that, if Stop’n’Shop couldn’t successfully negotiate a
contract that was agreed-upon to not push the corporation too hard, the
union would’ve voted via a small panel to put those 40,000 people out of work
without giving them the slightest chance to collectively bargain, which is the
very most basic right that ought to be given to union workers. The workers
would’ve gotten a few bucks an hour to shoulder a protest sign for a few hours
a week (which is the only discernible way I can see of the workers getting back even
so much as a penny they paid to this worthless union that can’t seem to
negotiate for them even a penny an hour over the state-mandated minimum wage) while
watching customers and scabs
cross their picket lines and both executive management and the union would’ve
been quite happy to see that happen.
I utterly fail to see why this union is
allowed to remain in business. Granted, not all its constituents make $8 per
hour but the vast majority of them do. Even assuming all 40,000 of its members
in three New England states kick in just $8 a week (and I’m sure those working
at skilled positions and making more than minimum wage pay higher dues), that still
comes out to a cool $116,800,000 a year (and that’s just from their New England
members, not New York state or other states in which it’s wormed itself), which
is a lot of cake for a union that won’t or can’t bargain for better than a
minimum wage that’d already been mandated years ago by Beacon Hill. That means
a lot of union fat cats at the top are raking in a lot of moolah for shit they’re
not even doing.
My eyes got wider when my friend
informed me that he was informed on his hire that he could expect a pay raise
of no more than .30¢ an hour after 6 months on the job. Even if
he was working 40 hours a week (and I guarantee he is not), that would come out
to an extra $12 a week, which isn’t even enough for two packs of cigarettes or
four gallons of gas.).
The Stop’n’Shop corporation keeps the
union around like Napoleon and Snowball kept the crow around in Animal Farm: To coo niceties in the ears
of the proletariat about the virtues and rewards of hard labor for little in
return. With this useless union, the corporation can continue to project the
image of acting in good faith with their employees for the dubious benefit of
those stupid enough to believe it. This bedroom union that is so incredibly
between the sheets with the corporation’s executive management serves as a
useful fig leaf, plausible deniability that they’re anti-union.
And I have never in all my years in the
work force ever seen a union that was comfortable with its workers making minimum
wage for years and years on end and cannot (or will not through some collusive deal) even negotiate better health
care coverage (they nearly went on strike years ago over that very same issue).
When the next-to-last contract was hashed
out after the usual shadowboxing between the corporation and the “union”, the
store audaciously said in a press release that the contract gave “very
competitive wage packages and retirement benefits as well as access to quality,
affordable health care.”
It’s utterly impossible to see how
minimum wage for most of its store-level positions and prohibitively high
health care premiums that are expected to be paid for out of paychecks in which
most if not all workers are held well below 40 hours a week can in any way,
shape or form be construed as “very competitive.” (Unless a race to the bottom can be construed as "competition.") And, with a chain and an
industry with such a revolving door policy in which workers are actually
discouraged in one way or another from making a career working for the corporation,
it’s just as impossible to see where retirement benefits for non-management
workers even plays a part.
The bottom of the article to which I’d
linked regarding their pathetic excuse for a contract goes on to state, perhaps
acerbically or not, “Stop & Shop is owned by Ahold USA. In its last
earnings release, the company reported that net sales at Stop & Shop and
Giant-Landover had increased 10.5 percent to $4.4 billion.” That’s a lot of pie
the corporation could be sharing with its employees but shares, instead,
with its utterly corrupt bedroom union.
1 Comments:
That really is disgusting, but then, even the most powerful of remaining unions are but shadows of their former selves. We just negotiated our usual whopping 1% raise above our few bucks over minimum (this time in return for renegotiation in 6 mo) but at least have some small modicum of benefits...
SB-
SEIU Union Steward
Post a Comment
<< Home