If He Hollers, Don’t Let Him Go
(By
American Zen’s Mike
Flannigan, on loan from Ari.)
“The only
way the American Negro will ever be able to participate in the American way of
life is by a series of acts of violence-it’s tragic, but it’s true.” – African American
author Chester Himes
“The
white spectators were fortunate that there were no blacks among them, despite
the accidental casualties, for had these irate, nervous cops spied a black face
in their midst there was no calculating the number of whites who would have
been killed by them accidentally.” – Chester Himes, “Prediction”
Chester Himes, one of America’s
greatest authors of the 20th century, can be considered a prophet if
the definition of a prophet is the ability of one to survey the lay of the land
and predict trends or even to just latch on to certain behaviors that renew
themselves decade after decade.
In 1969, Himes had published a
neglected short story, a gory affair entitled, “Prediction”, which was about a
black sniper who takes on 6000 invariably white cops in a parade designed to
show racial unity in an eponymous American city. To anyone who follows true
crime in 20th century America, it seemed to presage the week-long
massacre that took place in New Orleans a little over two years after the
publication of “Prediction” at the hands of Navy veteran Mark Essex. In early 1972, Essex shot
several officers and civilians and he’d single-handedly held the NOPD and a
military chopper at bay for several hours before exposing himself to over 200
rounds. Nowadays, it would be considered an act of terrorism.
The narrative the press and
authorities had given is that Essex was some loonie black militant without
seemingly exploring the reason for his racially-motivated rage (he’d allowed
three African American chambermaids at the Howard Johnson Hotel to leave,
explaining he was there to kill only white people). But the fact was, Essex was
sick and tired of the racial prejudice permeating the military and the Navy in
particular as was fellow Navy veteran Christopher Dorner. Both men put on
uniforms in racially polarized environments while naïvely expecting their
competence alone would give them a fair shake.
Dorner wasn’t any more a black
militant than the San Bernadino Sheriff’s Department that plainly gave the
order to burn down the cabin into which he’d holed himself. Police
band chatter betrays sheriff’s deputies calling for the “burners”
the press had been told were mere tear gas canisters (as we were told after
Waco) and had indisputably made the decision to watch the cabin burn without
the intervention of the Fire Department until Dorner died. It was an execution,
plain and simple. As Samuel L. Jackson said at the end of Die Hard 3, "Fuck him, let him cook."
Both rampages were fueled by an
incendiary hatred toward police officers and Dorner’s was necessarily one
nurtured as an insider. And when these self-styled vigilantes murder innocents,
as Essex surely did and which Dorner allegedly had, it’s impossible for any but
the most misguided bleeding heart liberal to see beyond that and vilify the
person, even commending the pertinent police departments for a job well done.
But in both cases, there was no serious
examination into the provenance of such racially-motivated hatred and no one
who wants to keep their job in the mainstream media will ever publicly opine
that such racially motivated hatred is not self-sustaining and
self-conceived but a reaction to entrenched bigotries and hatred that was
established and institutionalized long before Christopher Dorner or Mark Essex
were even born.
What distinguishes the Dorner case
is that the press was held at bay so as not to give the gunman a strategic
advantage by monitoring law enforcement’s movements outside. That makes for a
very convenient excuse and one has to read the news accounts very thoroughly to
hit upon the realization that the cabin in which Dorner had made his last stand
had neither television, a phone line or internet access. And during the final siege
before the order to torch the cabin I think it can be posited that Dorner was
too busy fighting off law enforcement that was there to kill and not arrest him
to be checking up on himself with a smart phone. Essentially,
the ruse worked because the MSM, after a simple request from the LAPD that had
no jurisdiction at Big Bear, fell down like parishioners at a Benny Hinn
revival and did their bidding.
The
Angry Black Man is Coming to Get You
One of the most fearsome stereotypes
of White America is the meme of the Angry Black Man. The genetically racist right
wing tried that tack in 2008 during Mr. Obama’s presidential campaign and
failed miserably with it. It’s a virtually atavistic fear going back to the Amistad
uprising, Nat Turner’s rebellion and Rosewood all the way down to the Rodney
King riots just over 20 years ago. And underpinning this fear is guilt and
insecurity because African Americans will learn and never forget the history of
their forbears. It’s a macroscopic version of a father who molested his child
when they were still very young and innately knowing the day of reckoning will
some day come.
It’s always much easier to point the
finger of blame at so-called black radicals who take innocent lives than it is to
point it at white police officers and Naval personnel who anecdotally engage in
racist behavior that results in occasional black rage. Racism has always been a
part of the American psyche since the days of the earliest colonists and
succeeding generations grow up believing it’s an inevitable fact of American
life.
We don’t know the name of Himes’
sniper, his background or the reason for his rage at white people, especially
the police, and Himes didn’t think he needed context, as if black rage was also
an unalterable fact of American life (and, for the time being and for a time to
come, I fear, it is). But after reading “Prediction”, one gets the sense the
onus for murdering innocent people will be squarely and exclusively placed on
the sniper and his dead body just as it had on Essex and, most recently,
Dorner.
Forgotten was the fact that, in
Dorner’s case, the LAPD was engaging in reckless vigilante behavior that only
validated Dorner’s claims in his manifesto published on Facebook. Two small
Asian women were shot by the LAPD and a white man driving a pickup that only
very superficially resembled Dorner’s was also shot at. In fact, in Himes’ prescient
short story, the urban police department began wildly shooting with a 20 mm
cannon that took out 29 of their own officers and wounding another 117, not including civilians in the crowd.
This is also another fact of modern
day American life because, as with the rest of us, law enforcement in America
responds to civilian opposition out of paranoia, hatred and a reckless frenzy that inevitably gets a free pass
from their chiefs, sheriffs, commissioners, the mainstream media and, ultimately,
the American public. As long as the bad guy gets it, the ends justify the
means, especially if we the news consumers don’t lose anything in the process.
The ineluctable revelation that one
cannot help but take away from this latest police debacle is that A)
Christopher Dorner never had a chance. There was one rule of engagement and
that was terminate with extreme prejudice whether it be by bullets or blazes.
Dorner, however briefly, placed a burning spotlight on the well-known racism of the LAPD and he knew too much. And too many people would've listened to him during a trial. B) No serious examination of the racial prejudice that resulted in Dorner’s
jihad against the LAPD and San Bernadino Sheriff’s Dept. will ever be done, which in itself was perhaps the biggest overarching rationale behind Dorner's rampage. We
all know how effectively the police police themselves and no possibility of racism, cover-ups
or incompetence can even be hinted lest it causes public distrust and paranoid
hatred to erupt into actual riots and rebellion. The only thing the LAPD consented to look at again was not his charges of racism against his fellow officers but the circumstances surrounding his dismissal, a revisit that obviously will let the original verdict stand.
And, in our heavily-regulated and
repressed country, it’s easy to understand if not actually endorse the mindset
of those who were secretly or even openly cheering on Dorner because the
seductiveness of the outlaw taking on a corrupt system is an irresistible one
since the days of Robin Hood. That would be a very misguided endorsement as
Dorner allegedly killed four innocent people.
Yet another inevitable fact of American
life, one that needs to change immediately before more innocents are
slaughtered, is it’s easier to choke off accountability at the outlaw’s level
and to not examine the institutionalized and viciously protected racial bigotry that makes impotent minority outrage explode into
outright violence.
1 Comments:
During Dorner's ... well, I don't know what to call it -- I was very much reminded of The Running Man (one of Stephen King's 'Bachman books', not the Schwarzenegger film). The conclusion of the 'run' in the novel's program was always bloody, and spectacular.
Post a Comment
<< Home